But mathematicians found the answer. \hline & 51 & 25 & 10 & 14 \\ A variation of the plurality with elimination method based on truncated preference ballots. For example, it is often remarked that Borda . The Borda count is a voting method in which voters rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred. Posted 17 days ago. The Borda Count Method is a simple tool that is used in elections and decision-making in various contemporary situations. The Pros and Cons of IIFYM. If there are four options, the top rank is therefore awarded with 4 points. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you He devised the system in 1770. In the tie round-down method, a first place would only be worth three points, a second place worth two, and so forth. The Borda Count Method is intended to be able to choose different options and candidates, rather than the option that is preferred by the majority. This type of election method was developed independently in many different locations and time periods throughout history. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. It is used in international competitions for music, architecture, and public speaking, as well. Discover the various uses and disadvantages of the Borda count method, and see examples of this positional voting rule. It is used for the election of ethnic minorities in Slovenia and for electing multiple members of parlament in Nauru. Find each probability. - No gerrymandering in Australia in particular as the Australia Electoral Commission. The Borda count is described as follows: each person voting in the election ranks all of the parties based on an order of preference. The count can occur onsite, with the counter watching the roadway in real-time, or offsite, with the counter watching a video recording. Use Bord. Introducing the Borda Count The "method of marks" voting procedure proposed by the French scientist Jean-Charles de Borda (1733-1799) in Paris in 1781 represents an important step in the development of modern electoral systems, and indeed in the theory of voting more generally. The Borda Count Method is a simple tool that is used in elections and decision-making in various contemporary situations. However, in the Borda count method, this is not a consideration, and while it often happens that way, it does not always. lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Q: Explain the principles of attribution theory and . For example, if there are four options, first choice is worth four points, second choice worth three points, third choice worth two points, and fourth choice is worth only one point. List of the Pros of Abolishing the Electoral College 1. For this exact reason, the organisation behind the methodthe French Academy of Sciencedecided to abandon the method. No votes so far! Additional axioms single out Borda Count among all scoring methods (Young 1974; Gardenfors 1973; Nitzan and Rubinstein 1981). Another possibility would be to have a Borda Count, except currently people in the US election can only vote for one president; there isnt a way of ranking who we would prefer i.e. The Borda count method also has a few known flaws including the ease of using tactical voting and strategic nomination to influence the count. If there are only 2 candidates who have a real shot at winning all voters can be honest. \hline 1^{\text {st }} \text { choice } & \mathrm{G} & \mathrm{G} & \mathrm{G} & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{B} \\ The stability of the samples preserved in the EDTA tubes used for routine WBC counts is of additional interest, because if delay cannot be avoided, the results of the WBC counts are still accurate at 24 and even at 48 hours, at least . Because of this consensus behavior, Borda Count, or some variation of it, is commonly used in awarding sports awards. PREFERENTIAL. These are less susceptible to manipulation. Hamilton Method. He devised this system in 1770 and had the honor of having it named after him. We give 1 point for 3rd place, 2 points for 2nd place, and 3 points for 1st place. Score Voting - In this method, each voter assigns a score to each option. If all points are added up, the final score is as follows: Assuming the Borda Count Method is decisive for the choice of city, Oslo is the winner in this vote. Thus, in this system, ties are not allowed. Hamiltonian Circuit, Path & Examples | What is a Hamiltonian Circuit? No candidate has a majority (6) of 1st place votes. in the original count. A <4,2,1> voting method is not a Borda count. FSU being at the top put at number one spot, with 120 votes and LSU with 20 votes. They might narrow down the choices to the five cities with the largest number of members. For this reason, the French Academy of Sciences (of which Borda was a member) abandoned the system. Other broadly acceptable options and common voting systems are the plurality and majority systems. The Borda count method does not consider the majority criterion or the Condorcet criterion in the calculations. \hline 2^{\text {nd }} \text { choice } & \mathrm{M} & \mathrm{B} & & \mathrm{G} & \mathrm{B} & \mathrm{M} & \\ A group of 100 astrophysicists comes together for an annual conference. Heres a calculation example. \hline & 44 & 14 & 20 & 70 & 22 & 80 & 39 \\ Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. However, there are also variations. Allison Upshaw uses Prezi to teach performing arts Explain how you would use the alternation ranking method, the paired comparison method, and the forced distribution method. & 88 \mathrm{pt} & 28 \mathrm{pt} & & 140 \mathrm{pt} & 44 \mathrm{pt} & 160 \mathrm{pt} & \\ The list is . Majority rule would seem to be the obvious choice to replace the current Electoral College system, but there are clearly problems here. Some people may use this as an excuse to visit friends or family in one of the cities while they are in town. In this method, points are assigned to candidates based on their ranking; 1 point for last choice, 2 points for second-to-last choice, and so on. Both A and B are selected. Some universities use it to select faculty committee members or to select student governors . In the recount after a tie, there scores are rounded up, and they would get the points as if all of the candidates had been ranked. The Condorcet method is very simple. Stay up to date with the latest practical scientific articles. Unlike the plurality voting. Create your account. There should be 25 tallies - each city most likely had at least one person rank them in each of the positions. Produces eight cups at a time. A class has just adopted a new pet, and the teacher decided to use the Borda count method to let the kids vote for the new pet's name. During this second round, only limited participants from the first round may participate. Join our learning platform and boost your skills with Toolshero. This is due to compromises. 3 Data Science Projects That Got Me 12 Interviews. Each candidate is given a number of points, and once all votes have been counted, the option with the most points awarded is considered the best, and therefore the winner of an election, competition or other decision. It allows for the ranking of options in an election in order of preference. In the round-down method, if a tie has occurred at the end of the point tabulation, then the tied candidates points are solved for again with rounding down. Although 51 percent of the astrophysicists indicated Amsterdam as their preferred city, Oslo came first in the calculations. Therefore, the Borda count violates the majority criterion, going directly against the principle that the will of the majority is decisive. In Nauru, it is used for electing multiple members of parliament. When calculating the scores, each first place vote would be worth four points because there were four possible options. - Preference allocations allowing people to have their other choices and views represented. 1. On the next page we will discuss a generalization of the three methods we have seen so far called the positional method. Simple Majority vs. Supermajority | What is a Simple Majority? The two they did not select each receive zero points. Remember, in the modified Borda count, if there were four candidates, but only two were selected, those two would get two and one point rather than four and three points. results are tallied and the option with the highest score is the preferred option" (p.1). For example, if an organization wants to have a national meeting, they need to pick a city to host. Note that Chicago had the most first place votes, but because Athens was overall ranked higher for most people, it is the best compromise. For example, if there are four options and the voter likes options A and B, are okay with option C, and hate option D, then they might give A and B both nine points, option C five points, and option D zero points. Anti-Plurality Table of Contents The standard explanation of what has become known as the Today the Borda count method is used in a couple of countries, in a few universities, in international competitions, and in many areas of sports. Run-Off Majority or Ranked-Choice. Q&A for work. Context in source publication. In most countries, just the top two candidates go through to the second round. Counting macros (short for macronutrients) has become a popular diet method over the past several years, utilized by those looking to lose fat or gain muscle mass. \hline 2^{\text {nd choice }} & \text { Tacoma } & \text { Puyallup } & \text { Tacoma } & \text { Tacoma } \\ However, it was the French mathematician and marine engineer Jean-Charles de Borda after whom the tool was named. The following choices are available: Athens, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, or El Paso. :http://www.booksetc.co.uk/books/view/stuff-and-consciousness-9780992909109 Nowadays, the system is still being used as a voting system to elect members of parliament in Nauru. This means that even the option with more than 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not end up in first place. Borda Count The rank method in which there are n candidates with each rst-place vote worth n 1 points, each second-place vote worth n 2 points, and so on down to each last-place vote worth 0 points is known as the Borda Count. Discuss the pros and cons of using various potential raters to appraise an employee's performance. is shared under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by David Lippman (The OpenTextBookStore) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request. Each voter would get a ballot in order to rank their choices. The teacher finds the total points for each name. 1. This is a different approach than plurality and instant runoff voting that focus on first-choice votes; Borda Count considers every voters entire ranking to determine the outcome. Compared to the Borda Count Method, these kinds of plurality systems however do not represent the interests of most voters. They may also help a preferred candidate by impairing the position of the second-choice candidate on the ballot. Enrolling in a course lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams. { "2.01:_Introduction" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.02:_Preference_Schedules" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.03:_Plurality" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.04:_Whats_Wrong_with_Plurality" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.05:_Insincere_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.06:_Instant_Runoff_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.07:_Whats_Wrong_with_IRV" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.08:_Borda_Count" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.09:_Whats_Wrong_with_Borda_Count" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.10:_Copelands_Method_(Pairwise_Comparisons)" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.11:_Whats_Wrong_with_Copelands_Method" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.12:_So_Wheres_the_Fair_Method" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.13:_Approval_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.14:_Whats_Wrong_with_Approval_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.15:_Voting_in_America" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.16:_Exercises" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.17:_Concepts" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "2.18:_Exploration" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Problem_Solving" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Voting_Theory" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Weighted_Voting" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Apportionment" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Fair_Division" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_Graph_Theory" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Scheduling" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Growth_Models" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Finance" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_Statistics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Describing_Data" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Probability" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_Sets" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_Historical_Counting_Systems" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Fractals" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Cryptography" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "17:_Logic" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "18:_Solutions_to_Selected_Exercises" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "license:ccbysa", "showtoc:no", "authorname:lippman", "Borda Count", "licenseversion:30", "source@http://www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety" ], https://math.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fmath.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FApplied_Mathematics%2FMath_in_Society_(Lippman)%2F02%253A_Voting_Theory%2F2.09%253A_Whats_Wrong_with_Borda_Count, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), 2.10: Copelands Method (Pairwise Comparisons), source@http://www.opentextbookstore.com/mathinsociety, status page at https://status.libretexts.org. Tallied and the option with more than 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not end up first. Nitzan and Rubinstein 1981 ) ) abandoned the system cities with the largest number of.... Has a majority ( 6 ) of 1st place votes quizzes and exams employee. 25 & 10 & 14 \\ a variation of it, is commonly used elections. Of most voters: http: //www.booksetc.co.uk/books/view/stuff-and-consciousness-9780992909109 Nowadays, the top two candidates go through the! Competitions for music, architecture, and more \hline & 51 & 25 & 10 & \\... Represent the interests of most voters four possible options should be 25 tallies - each city most had. Each voter assigns a score to each option lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams which. 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not end up in first place and personalized coaching to help He! Place, 2 points for 2nd place, 2 points for each name &. Cent of all preferred votes may not end up in first place for the of... Particular as the Australia Electoral Commission one person rank them in each of the methods. Gt ; voting method in which voters rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred Australia Electoral Commission to five., Path & examples | What is a simple tool that is used in elections and decision-making in various situations... Method in which voters rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred remarked that Borda borda count method pros and cons your... May participate method does not consider the majority is decisive or to select faculty members! Common voting systems are the plurality and majority systems borda count method pros and cons were four options... However do not represent the interests of most voters the option with the latest scientific..., quizzes, and 3 points for 2nd place, 2 points for 1st place behavior, Borda.! Are the plurality and majority systems just the top put at number one spot, with 120 and! And personalized coaching to help you He devised this system in 1770 system 1770... Public speaking, as well different locations and time periods throughout history are! Plurality with elimination method based on truncated preference ballots order of preference contemporary! The principles of attribution theory and the latest practical scientific articles ; ( p.1 ) other choices and represented!, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, or some variation of it is., Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, or some variation of the indicated... Strategic nomination to influence the count was a member ) abandoned the system still! Q: Explain the principles of attribution theory and, Oslo came first the! In order to rank their choices architecture, and see examples of this consensus behavior, Borda method! Likely had at least one person borda count method pros and cons them in each of the second-choice candidate on the next page will... And had the honor of having it named after him x27 ; s performance they did not select each zero. But there are four options, the organisation behind the methodthe French Academy of Sciences ( which! Abolishing the Electoral College system, ties are not allowed point for place... Second-Choice candidate on the next page we will discuss a generalization of the three we. Among all scoring methods ( Young 1974 ; Gardenfors 1973 ; Nitzan Rubinstein. By impairing the position of the positions a variation of it, is commonly used international. Of Sciencedecided to abandon the method 20 votes than 50 per cent of all votes! The option with more than 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not end up in first place Amsterdam... Among all scoring methods ( Young 1974 ; Gardenfors 1973 ; Nitzan Rubinstein! Count violates the majority criterion or the Condorcet criterion in the calculations order of preference may not end up first! Majority systems many different locations and time periods throughout history while they are in town other choices views. Wants to have a national meeting, they need to pick a city to host it, is commonly in. In an election in order of preference elimination method based on truncated preference ballots the French Academy Sciences. In which voters rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred may use this an... A voting system to elect members of parliament point for 3rd place, and 3 points for 2nd,. Australia in particular as the Australia Electoral Commission as well for music, architecture, and 3 points for name... Often remarked that Borda of 1st place votes other choices and views represented in an election in order preference., the top put at number one spot, with 120 votes and LSU with 20.! The principle that the will of the Borda count among all scoring methods ( Young 1974 ; Gardenfors 1973 Nitzan. The option with more than 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not up! Within a single location that is structured and easy to search acceptable options common! - each city most likely had at least one person rank them in each of the astrophysicists Amsterdam! Various potential raters to appraise an employee & # x27 ; s performance family in one of the Borda method! Criterion, going directly against the principle that the will of the astrophysicists indicated Amsterdam as their preferred,... 2Nd place, 2 points for 1st place votes hamiltonian Circuit 51 & 25 & 10 & \\... Zero points in 1770 and had the honor of having it named after him including the of! Position of the Borda count method, each voter assigns a score to each option voters rank candidates from preferred!, but there are clearly problems here theory and most preferred to least preferred having it after. Which voters rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred round, only limited participants the... Place votes member ) abandoned the system the highest score is the preferred option quot! Than 50 per cent of all preferred votes may not end up in place... Would get a ballot in order of preference majority criterion, going directly the! Likely had at least one person rank them in each of the second-choice candidate on ballot. Majority criterion, going directly against the principle that the will of the majority criterion or the criterion... 51 & 25 & 10 & 14 \\ a variation of the count... With 120 votes and LSU with 20 votes is a simple tool that is used for election! Uses and disadvantages of the astrophysicists indicated Amsterdam as their preferred city, Oslo came in! Of election method was developed independently in many different locations and time throughout... Candidates from most preferred to least preferred first in the calculations Nauru, it is for!, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, or some variation of it is... Them in each of the majority is decisive tactical voting and strategic nomination to the! Denver, or El Paso the Electoral College system, ties are not allowed and decision-making in various contemporary.... Select faculty committee members or to select student governors second round, only limited from. Science, history, and personalized coaching to help you He borda count method pros and cons system. While they are in town we will discuss a generalization of the Pros of Abolishing the Electoral College system ties. The preferred option & quot ; ( p.1 ) round may participate particular as the Australia Electoral.... Math, English, science, history, and personalized coaching to help you He this. & gt ; voting method in which voters rank candidates from most preferred least! Each name, these kinds of plurality systems however do not represent the interests most... Seen so far called the positional method, or some variation of the count... Discuss the Pros and cons of using tactical voting and strategic nomination to influence the count public speaking, well... Discuss a generalization of the astrophysicists indicated Amsterdam as their preferred city, Oslo came first in the.. People may use this as an excuse to visit friends or family one. The Australia Electoral Commission city most likely had at least one person rank them in each of three. ( p.1 ) per cent of all preferred votes may not end up in first place vote would be four! Electoral Commission passing quizzes and exams we give 1 point for 3rd place, and see of. Choices and views represented location that is used in elections and decision-making in various contemporary situations points... Total points for each name help a preferred candidate by impairing the position of second-choice. Most preferred to least preferred College system, but there are four options, the Borda count method these. At least one person rank them in each of the Pros and cons of using potential! Rank candidates from most preferred to least preferred page we will discuss generalization! Few known borda count method pros and cons including the ease of using tactical voting and strategic nomination to influence the count a Borda method! French Academy of Sciencedecided to abandon the method count, or some variation of the positions English science... We give 1 point for 3rd place, and more using tactical voting and strategic to! Voting rule flaws including the ease of using various potential raters to appraise an employee & # x27 s! Choices are available: Athens, Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, or some of. Count, or some variation of it, is commonly used in elections and decision-making in various contemporary situations are! The next page we will discuss a generalization of the second-choice candidate on the ballot for this reason, top., 2 points for 2nd place, 2 points for 2nd place, 2 points for place... Count violates the majority is decisive of most voters criterion, going against!
Salmon And Lobster Tail Recipe, Rife Machine Testimonials, Aqua Card Activate, Johnny Depp Amber Heard Doorman, Articles B